Folk as Modern: Exploring the Aesthetic Language of Jamini Roy

Are you an artist? List your art for free with our Android app and reach thousands of art lovers who visit Oak Lores every day.

Imagine a man from 1930s Calcutta who walks away from oil paints, European techniques, and upper-class commissions from his own will. He takes up coarse cloth, mineral pigments, and local brushes. His goal was to make Indian art radically modern and deeply imprinted on Indian cultural practices, stripped out of colonial hangovers and elite pretensions. This man was the famous Jamini Roy. Long before “Make in India” became a slogan for cultural resistance, Roy lived it on his canvas. He searched for an Indian visual proliferation that was completely independent of European approval. Jamini Roy’s artworks were not only just a style of painting, but also a way of visualising Indian cultural practices on canvases. The style transformed everyday lives into icons, folk traditions to modernism, and art into a tool of cultural representation.

Framing a Folk-Modernist Vison

Jamini Roy (1887–1972) is regarded as one of the most influential artist and practitioner of Indian modern art. Realizing that Indian painters were caught in a conundrum, either as Western academic realist or Bengal School romantic idealism, Roy’s brilliant incorporation of indigenous folk influences defined his own aesthetic. Roy’s sophisticated aesthetic often coined the “Jamini Roy style”, became more than an aesthetic, it became a cultural statement connecting the intellectual flow of gallery art with the barebones reality of folk art, it represented the decolonized visual idiom in the soil of Bengal carving out a new space in the visual conversation. The purpose of this essay is to discuss the genesis, development, subject matter of Jamini Roy’s artistic journey, and how it is relevant today.

The Cultural Genesis of a Movement

Jamini Roy was born at Beliatore, a very small village in the Bankura district of West Bengal. The Bankura district itself is rich in the visual language of Bengal’s folk tradition – Pattachitra scrolls; Kalighat painting; terracotta temple sculptures, and other sacred arts and artefacts. As a young artist, Roy trained at the Government College of Art in Calcutta, which was at that time still heavily influenced by British academic conventions. This training meant that Roy was grounded in European methods of painting, especially post-Impressionism. However, in the 1920s, Roy, like a number of others in the field, encountered a crisis in confidence and ideology amidst the tides of anti-colonial nationalism and cultural security. He became more consciously disenchanted with the Eurocentric paradigm of artistic representation, and sought to discover his own visual language as steeped in indigenous traditions.

Like many who took influence from Rabindranath Tagore, and the greater culturally-led movement of the Bengal School, Roy made an extreme break from fellow painters. Painters like Abanindranath Tagore were excited by Mughal miniatures, and Ajanta frescoes; connecting to a spiritual modernism for India that was still deeply influenced by neighbouring cultures. Roy was using the much earthier traditions of rural lexical and tribal villages. His work with Kalighat pats, Santhal motifs, and village artists was deeply political. He wanted a patronless art; democratic, accessible, decolonised; and one which related to the visual sensibilities of Indian people in their everyday lives in the most- autonomous.

Ascent of a New Dawn

In the late 1920s, Jamini Roy’s departure from academic norms and practices began to make waves and by the 1940s became widely recognised throughout the national arts context. Of course, Roy’s public success was based on more than simply personal genius, it also reflected a material and ideological reorientation of practice and an acceptance of audience. Roy adopted traditional Indian media in tempera, rejecting oils and Western canvas, the common North American and European painting material. Roy produced his pigments from natural, locally sourced materials; clay, lamp black, and even tamarind seed, thus effectively associating his making practice with the traditional craft-making practices of rural Bengal. This was both aesthetic and political—a clearly defined act of cultural autonomy that occurred in the context of the larger anti-colonial movement.

In making his art economically accessible, Roy actively resisted the exclusivity of colonial period exhibition gallery culture. In a twist of irony, his art soon began to gain traction, among the very affluent elite he had attempted to distance himself from. His conditioning of such bold formal language and identification with a nationalist ethos produced renown from some of the socio-political leaders important at that moment in time, including that of Mahatma Gandhi. By the 1940s, Roy was emerging as a major figure in Indian modern art, while opening one-man shows in Calcutta, Bombay, and even abroad in London. For Roy, as for other modernists working within a colonial experience, repetition held sacred meaning; it was not something to be abhorred.

Motifs, Myths, and Motherland

Jamini Roy’s visual language is a polished version of everyday vernacular styles and modernist clarity, providing a distinct alternative to Western realism and to the mystical dreamworlds of the Bengal School in the way they model forms of recognizable, expressive thought. On the contrary, Roy’s visual language renounces illusionism. Roy’s compositions favour flatness, symmetry, and bold outlines. Roy’s surfaces foreground form much more than depth, laying bare illusion, though an illusion of simplicity is a large vehicle for his work. Indeed, in Roy’s compositions every material or pictorial element has a cultural, spiritual, or social dimension, conjoined in the everyday life and devotional mindscape of Bengal.

A recurrent subject in Roy’s work is that of the Santhal tribe – represented through images of dance, music, and communal enjoyment. In the eyes of Roy, the Santhal tribe possessed an untainted aesthetic and moral innocence, and his renderings vibrate with the Santhal individual’s gestural dynamism and elemental unity with nature. The other central subject are the representations of the mother and child that Roy has reinterpreted through a syncretic Christian iconography of the Madonna with classical Hindu representations. Again, the mother and child images are imbued with an understanding that transcends literal motherhood, tapping into the sacred potential of nurturing. The stylized almond-shaped eyes and gentle expressions, of the depicted figures, engage with a framework of nurturing as a sacred wage.

Roy’s eyes, especially, are symbolic—stretched, side-eyeing, taken from the Bengali patua tradition, to signify, rather than suggest anatomical details. His mythic images, particularly Krishna Leela and Ramayana, are pictorial sermons—devotional yet unembellished, modest in ways that could be considered ascetic in contrast to the over-embellished specificity of classical temple art, the divine is manifestly human.

Roy also decorated his respects to other traditions by framing his canvases, or filling them up, with ornamental or repetitive designs and earthy color palettes of ocher, indigo, terracotta red and chalky white—colors inspired by Kalighat painting and rural mural traditions. His use of local pigments and, for example, tempera on mat boards, wood panels, and cloth impart a kind of embodied architectural physicality. For example, in Roy’s portrayal of animals—cats, cows, birds—he did not merely decorate the work, they made claims to a memory and reference laden with domestic, religious, and folkloric meaning, parochial claims.

Ultimately, through this visual language, Jamini Roy was not simply an illustrator of Indian life, he remade it in a relevant, native modernism.

From Scrolls to Screen

Jamini Roy’s art was a vehicle for the cultural and religious beliefs of rural Bengal, though the influence of his word made and visual idioms are both subtle and blatant, and can be seen in popular culture and popular artists beyond the context of Bengal. The rich colour palette, the flattened form of his figures, and the distinct linearity of his work, has touched different disciplines across the contemporary arts, including film, fashion and digital media.

In film, Roy’s paintings are not directly reproduced, but we find their aesthetic echoes in the films of others like Satyajit Ray. The films Pather Panchali (1955) and Aparajito (1956), for example, seem visually closer to Roy’s minimalism and agrarian way of life in their most straightforward and simple features—dislocation, groundedness, and an appreciation for the quotidian.

Yet the cultural connection is beyond aesthetic, as Ray’s father, Sukumar Ray, was a contemporary of Roy, and both had similar experiences moving in a contemporaneous set of reforms for art practices within Bengal. More recently, Roy-inspired depictions or motifs can be found in films like Rituparno Ghosh‘s Chitrangada (2012).

Roy’s art has also made a noticeable impact on graphic novels and literary publishing. Books such as The Patua Pinocchio and Bhimayana reinvigorate folk visual practices in contemporary ways, and carry Roy’s interest in clarity of narrative and richness of symbols. Bengali poetry anthologies by writers such as Shankha Ghosh and Jibanananda Das regularly feature covers with Roy-like illustrations, connecting the textual and visual traditions.

In the fields of design and fashion as well, artists like Sabyasachi Mukherjee cite Roy as an influence in areas such as colour palettes, motifs, textiles, jewellery and the decor of interiors. This can be seen in everything from saree borders to wall murals in cafes in major cities in Kolkata and Delhi.

Roy’s visual language has found an even larger audience through the affordances of social media platforms. His images, often reproduced as memes, have come to signify a certain decolonial aesthetic resistance in a time where cultural localism appears like a revival of indigenous pride as a reaction to global homogeneity. In these various ways, Jamini Roy continues to be part of the cultural landscape and engage audiences as living visual vocabularies, ready for continual re-interpretation.

Recognising the Legend

Jamini Roy’s artistic journey was not only about creating beautiful paintings but also about overturning conventions and earning respect for this work. While the artistic achievement was evident in his beautiful paintings, numerous awards and recognitions defined him as a seminal artist in Indian modern art. Among many awards he received the Viceroy’s Gold Medal at All India Exhibition in 1934 and Padma Bhushan in 1955. He was also elected as one of the Fellows of Lalit Kala Akademi in 1956 and One of Nine Masters in 1976 by Archaeological Survey of India. This was an honour he shared with several other eminent artists and now the designation put him amongst the most valued artist of the country and recognized the deep influence of his work on the history of Indian art.

A Living Modernism

Jamini Roy’s artistic practice represents a radical reinterpretation of modernism in India, one that privileged cultural continuity over rupture, and rootedness or particularity over abstraction. By combining rural idioms with formal innovation, Roy created a more accessible, indigenous, and modern aesthetic experience. Roy’s anti-colonial stance rejected Western materials, elite patronage and mimetic realism not only from a stylistic position, but from an ideological one, which visually enacted what it meant to be swadeshi. Roy’s practice still exists in the world, not only in museums and discourses found in academic pedagogy, but in the very stuff of everyday daily culture, whether it be in fashion, cinema, on digital platforms, or in the classrooms of pedagogues. For all intents and purposes, Roy’s work is devoid of nationalistic art; it is a living archive of Indian modernity which confirms that innovation is simply more often the recovery of that which has been rendered lost.

References

1. Archer, W.G. India and Modern Art. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1959.
2. Dalmia, Yashodhara. Jamini Roy. New Delhi: Lalit Kala Akademi, 1987.
3. Mitter, Partha. The Triumph of Modernism: India’s Artists and the Avant-Garde, 1922–1947. London: Reaktion Books, 2007.
4. Sen, Geeti. “Folk Art and Modernity: The Vision of Jamini Roy.” India International Centre Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 2/3 (1994), pp. 179–190.
5. Ray, Satyajit. Our Films, Their Films. Orient Longman, 1976.
6. Chatterjee, Partha. The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton University Press, 1993.
7. National Gallery of Modern Art (NGMA). “Jamini Roy Retrospective.” https://ngmaindia.gov.in.
8. Victoria and Albert Museum. “Jamini Roy Collection.”https://www.vam.ac.uk.
9. Artflute Blog. “The Iconic Cats of Jamini Roy.” https://www.artflute.com/blog/the-iconic-cats-of-jamini-roy.
10. Google Arts & Culture. “Jamini Roy — Artist Profile.” Accessed June 15, 2025. https://artsandculture.google.com/entity/jamini-roy.
11. Sahapedia. “Jamini Roy and the Search for an Indian Modern Art.” Accessed June 15, 2025. https://www.sahapedia.org/jamini-roy-and-search-indian-modern-art.
12. Sarmaya Arts Foundation. “Jamini Roy: The People’s Modernist.” Accessed June 15, 2025. https://sarmaya.in/story/jamini-roy-the-peoples-modernist.
13. Scroll.in. “Why Jamini Roy Chose to Paint Like a Patua Rather Than a Paris-Trained Modernist.” September 2, 2018. https://scroll.in/article/893567.
14. The Heritage Lab. “Jamini Roy’s Art: 10 Paintings You Should Know.” https://www.theheritagelab.in/jamini-roy.
15. Natarajan, Srividya, S. Anand, and Durgabai Vyam. Bhimayana: Experiences of Untouchability. New Delhi: Navayana Publishing, 2011.
16. Ravishankar, Anushka, and Dulari Devi. The Patua Pinocchio. Chennai: Tara Books, 2010.